Joe Posnanski
Menu
  • Home
  • Cheap buspar in Los Angeles
  • Passions in America
  • The Athletic
  • Cialis online pharmacy in Ireland
  • What i should purchase with cialis
  • Where to buy retin in Houston online
    • Cheap accutane in Boston
Menu

HOF Candidates: 35-31

Posted on March 24, 2019March 31, 2019 by How to buy ventolin in Saudi Arabia

Below is a sneak peek of this content!

Continuing with your votes for the 100 best Hall of Fame candidates. No. 35: Thurman MunsonScore: 54.3 By bWAR, Thurman Munson was the second-best catcher of the 1970s after Johnny Bench. You can build a pretty convincing Hall of Fame argument around that. Munson won the MVP award in...
Hello. You're probably seeing this boring paragraph because you haven't signed up yet to become a member. You can sign up here. We have a lot of fun here -- we're counting down the 100 best major league players of all time, writing a lot about baseball and dieting and family and music and other sports and geek tech and infomercials and, you know, whatever comes to mind. Would love to have you join us. There's also a chance that you're reading this because you can't sign in -- if that's the case, please click here and you can go to "posts" and see all the stories and stuff directly on the Patreon membership site.
To view this content, you must be a member of Joe Posnanski's Patreon at "Posterisk*" or higher tier
Unlock with Patreon Unlock with Patreon

4 thoughts on “HOF Candidates: 35-31”

  1. Avatar Scott says:
    March 24, 2019 at 10:57 pm

    I know we don’t have the numbers, but if Munson was a good to great pitch framer he could pick up 1-2 wins there, possibly even 3. Throw in the narrative stuff, which is worth more than nothing but not much, and it wouldn’t be impossible they had comparable seasons.

    Log in to Reply
  2. Avatar David says:
    March 24, 2019 at 11:30 pm

    I went back and forth and did not think about the postseason. I picked Utley, solely by WAR7 (probably a vote of 50.01 versus 49.99). I think he was dirty too so it was not a popularity contest for me. 2005 through 2009, he put up 39.6. He basically averaged an 8 WAR for 5 straight years. Grich’s best 5 year streak was 35 (also awesome). I thought Utley at peak was slightly better than Grich while Grich gave more value long term as he came up earlier and had more late career value. Both should be in the HOF.

    Log in to Reply
  3. Avatar Dale says:
    March 25, 2019 at 1:43 am

    I’d still take Munson over Nettles. Sometimes WAR gets it wrong.

    Log in to Reply
  4. Avatar Rob says:
    March 25, 2019 at 2:48 pm

    With Munson, of course, you really have to factor in how much his early death cost him. Although he didn’t ever have eye popping offensive numbers (though he was a solid hitter), his defense was always very good to excellent. On one hand, he died at age 32, and was showing some decline. He had OPS’s of .705 and .714 his last two years. Those were down almost 50 points from his career average and 100 points from his career peak. On the other hand, during those last two decline years, he still had 3.3 and 2.4 WAR (without the two months after he died during a likely 3.0+ WAR season). Joe often talks about players who’s careers end at age 32 without being able to add to their value over another few years, even if at a reduced rate. If Munson was able to average 2.5 WAR over another 5 years, which seems entirely possible, he could have ended his career at around 55-58 WAR. That would have put him above HOFers Mickey Cochran (48), Buck Ewing (48) and near HOFer Ted Simmons (50). And just below HOFers Bill Dickey (58), Gabby Hartnett (60), Mike Piazza (59) and Yogi Berra (59). Obviously a lot of Munson’s value was defensive value unlike a lot of the guys on this list. But he was potentially right in there if he had another 5 decent years. It’s a little tough to guess how fast he would decline, especially at his position. But that’s what we’re forced to consider.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Become a JoeBlogs Member!

Archives

  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • January 2010
  • April 2009
  • September 2008
  • September 2007
  • April 2003
©2021 Joe Posnanski
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.